Daniil Medvedev has expressed his preference for a best-of-three sets format in Grand Slam matches, differing from Carlos Alcaraz's defense of the traditional best-of-five format. Alcaraz has argued that the longer matches are integral to the unique character of Grand Slam tournaments.
Read More
While Medvedev acknowledges that the current five-set structure is significant, he stated that if given a choice, he would opt for three sets. His comments came amid discussions about potential changes to reduce Grand Slam matches to best-of-three sets through the quarterfinals or for the entire tournament.
Medvedev believes such a shift could alter the identity of the sport's major events. Nonetheless, he reiterated that he would adapt to whatever format is ultimately decided. "Even though I also think playing five is good, I adapt to whatever is decided," he said. He indicated that a switch to three sets would not bother him, nor would he oppose keeping the five-set format.
Reflecting on the history of Masters 1000 tournaments, which once included five-set matches, Medvedev shared a positive recollection but does not advocate for reintroducing that format. "I focus on the game. I'll always do my best, no matter how many sets I have to play," he stated.
Medvedev is currently riding momentum after winning his 24th career title in Hangzhou by defeating Andrey Rublev. He reported feeling physically strong and optimistic about his performance moving forward in the season. The victory in Hangzhou evoked the thrill of winning, although he noted the distinction between smaller ATP titles and Grand Slam championships.