Caitlin Clark, the No. 1 overall pick in the 2024 WNBA Draft, encountered unexpected questioning from Fox News Digital’s Jackson Thompson during a media session after Team USA's recent victory at the FIBA World Cup in Berlin. The moment comes as Clark, at 24, continues to be recognized as a leading figure in women's basketball.

Read More

Clark has generally maintained a positive relationship with the media, often making herself available for interviews. However, during this media availability, Thompson posed a question that seemed to reference a past rivalry between Clark and her teammate Angel Reese. He asked, “Are you guys friends now?” to which Clark responded, “We’ve always been friends. Don’t try to do that.” This reaction highlighted her frustration with the attempt to reignite a narrative considered outdated.

The context for Thompson’s query stems from a 2023 incident during the NCAA tournament, which saw Reese use a gesture towards Clark that led to widespread media discussion. While many outlets have moved on, it appears Outkick aimed to revive this narrative during the World Cup coverage.

Thompson’s questioning style raised eyebrows among other reporters present. Emmet Ryan, editor of BallinEurope, noted that Thompson's inquiries to both Clark and Paige Bueckers included seemingly irrelevant or provocative topics, such as Bueckers’ relationship with Jesus and the significance of September 11th on team dynamics.

It’s noteworthy that Outkick’s decision to send Thompson to report from Berlin is unusual, as American reporters typically have limited attendance at international FIBA events. An Outkick source stated that the increasing attention on women's basketball justified the trip in light of Clark’s rising profile and recent performances.

Following the questioning incident, a representative from USA Basketball engaged with Thompson to discuss his approach to reporting. Meanwhile, both the Fever and Dream declined comment on the matter since it took place at a FIBA event.

As interest in the WNBA grows, so does the potential for sensational or misleading coverage. Increased scrutiny is a natural consequence for athletes like Clark and Reese, yet the intent behind certain questions can sometimes overshadow the significance of the sport itself. The incident raises questions about journalism's role in elevating meaningful discussions regarding women's basketball.